
My Dad told us a while back that he'd really like to take us to that there new
Creation Museum in Kentucky, put together by the folks at Answers in Genesis. We agreed, wanting to see it ourselves, and picked today as the day we would all go check it out.
First, it was a hot day, and there were LOTS of people with the same idea as us. :-) It was packed! Far more than I thought it would be on a Friday morning. But perhaps this is still a holiday weekend?
We did get to see
Ken Ham wandering through the lines as we were waiting to pay to get in. Didn't get to chat, but it was kinda cool/funny seeing him around there.
The place was just really well done. It was like Disney, but for the Bible. We even watched a fun "interactive" movie where the seats vibrated and we were sprayed by water and stuff. Very cool.
Overall, I think it might have been a good thing that I didn't get to read too many of their displays, or watch/hear too many of their video presentations at each station. I mean, I really enjoy this stuff - even enjoy the Creation science stuff... but... I'm not really a big supporter of AIG. I don't hate them, like some people (or at least, totally eschew anything they might say just because it is they who say it) but I am definitely not an AIG fan boy. :-)
We were thinking on the way home that Ken Ham and AIG's stance on the "young earth only" creation model is rather like the guy (who also has a society of "guys") who really thinks the Bible says the earth is at the center of the universe, and all else revolves around it. (Our sun included.) This dude thinks the Bible says just that, and that if we accept anything different, we'll be throwing out everything
else in the Bible too. To him geocentricity is foundational, and to AIG, 6000 years is foundational. To me, both of those ideas are putting too much emphasis on one thing, that doesn't really affect the veracity of the whole Bible.
I might actually lean more toward a "young earth" idea, but it would not crush me to think that God created the Earth first (perhaps even "Billions of years" ago?) and then brought animals and people into the picture in the much more recent past. Or, really, any scenario that has God creating us is plausible to me. I just think the
way he did it is a non-issue.
One interesting thing that I noticed - and I might make some folks mad here - is that I might now instinctively
not trust Christians. There were a couple times today that I noticed that, but the first was the greeter lady. She was overly happy and friendly, which is to be expected in her position. She's a greeter. That's her job. But I guess I either know the behind-the-scenes, or could just hear it in her tone/voice - there is an agenda. Christians just have an agenda. They are friendly for a reason. They help for a reason. They want something from you.
It's too bad I feel that way, but as I said, I had that impression/feeling a couple times today in Christian-land.
Overall, it was fantastic. I would go again. I would like to go again. Very impressive collection of stuff they have there. I might want to NOT go with at least our three and one year olds... :-) That might be a bit more conducive to actually experiencing the whole thing... :-)
So, a big thanks to Grandpa Tom for footing the bill and taking us out to see the Creation Museum. Fun way to spend a Friday! :-)
Labels: family, fun, Science