Foreigners

I've been thinking about "home" a little bit recently. We were visiting family this weekend who live about an hour and a half from our home. I was thinking about how if we lived there, it wouldn't ever quite feel like home. At least, to me. It would feel like we were always visiting. Never home.

A friend of ours is a native of Argentina, but also a citizen of Italy (and lived there for several years) and now resides here in New York. (Married to a US citizen.) So she has many homes, and in a way, often feels like she's "not home".

Home is interesting. It's definitely a location, but it's also a state of mind. The Bible says we who follow Jesus are foreigners. That we are never quite home. We read about the first disciples of Jesus today (the boys and I) who left everything at Jesus' simple invitation to, "Come follow me." He had no home, they had no home. They were travelers. Foreigners. Strangers.

Jen & I have also noticed recently how different we are. We are not like most of the people we know. Our priorities, what we want our family to live like, be like, look like. We're different. We feel, quite often, like foreigners.

So, how do you endure that? I guess the way you do is to know that no matter where we are in this life we are always foreigners. We are never home. We belong somewhere else, and until we leave this life or Jesus comes back for us, we'll always feel a little homesick.

With all the burdens of this foreign place that I am bearing lately, I am definitely "longing for home". For peace. Rest. But, that time has not come yet.

For now, I enjoy the "home" that God has given me. My beautiful wife, and five amazing kids. And our little yellow house. :-) Oh that life were only that simple.

Perhaps it can be.

Random Bible Verse Generator

I received an email this week from a guy who has designed a little widget that randomly displays a verse from the Bible (16 translations currently) that you can paste to a website or blog... wherever you'd like. It was pretty cool, so I pasted it in the sidebar to the right. The funny thing is, talk about out of context! Sometimes if you just get one verse... it can be a pretty random message! :-)

If you'd like to get your own, you can visit their website.

Subtle Difference

Today the boys and I read the very familiar paragraph in Matthew where Jesus says with the Ask, Seek & Knock stuff. God wants us to come to him and he wants us to know that he's listening. And that's amazing.

But the part I noticed is something that I have also been thinking a bit about recently.

At the end of the paragraph, Jesus says, "Treat others as you want them to treat you. This is what the Law and the Prophets are all about." (Matthew 7:12)

I have said that many times to my kids, and that is really how I want to live my life. Thinking about other people like I'd want them to think about me. Treating them as I would want to be treated. I actually forgot that Jesus said "That's what the Law & Prophets are all about" regarding this phrase. The other phrase I frequently use is "Love God, Love people." which is taken from another time Jesus said that, "Everything God has said up until now is summed up by that."

When he says that, it seems to me that we should listen.

But then, I have been challenged recently that thinking that way, and trying to live that way is still a bit religious. Though the motivation may not be from guilt, or a desire to earn God's favor, it is still about what I do. How I must change. How I must be. And certainly, on one level, that is good and right. When we do what is right - the way life is supposed to be lived - then life is good, and things work out the best way they can. Mostly.

Could a possible (subtle) alternative could be to focus on our relationship with God, rather than what we do after that? Could it be an even more healthy view of the Kingdom if we could say, "I am loved, and so are you." Do you see the subtle difference? I'm honestly not that sure I do, but a part of me does. The difference seems to be in the focus. One focus is still on what I can do, the other is focused on what God has done and is doing. He has restored our relationship, and he leads me every day, and he puts other people around me that I can love as I have been loved. Doesn't he?

It could just be semantics, and I know that I am prone to thinking too much on things at times. But the funny thing is, the more I "think on" this, the simpler it gets. Perhaps that is the true way of the kingdom.

Live loved today. I think when we do, then we are best able to really love back, and love out.

Relationality

This morning the boys and I continued our trek through the book of Matthew, with a tiny chunk from chapter five. I was just going to reference it, but I thought perhaps you might like to read the whole bit together for the context of what we saw in it today.

Matthew 5:21-25 (CEV)
You know that our ancestors were told, "Do not murder" and "A murderer must be brought to trial." But I promise you that if you are angry with someone, you will have to stand trial. If you call someone a fool, you will be taken to court. And if you say that someone is worthless, you will be in danger of the fires of hell.

So if you are about to place your gift on the altar and remember that someone is angry with you, leave your gift there in front of the altar. Make peace with that person, then come back and offer your gift to God.

Before you are dragged into court, make friends with the person who has accused you of doing wrong. If you don't, you will be handed over to the judge and then to the officer who will put you in jail.

Did you see it? What stood out to you about those three situations? I asked my boys, "What was the most important thing in all of those stories?"

At first they said excitedly, "Don't be mad!" I said, "That's part of it..." hoping they would continue. They did. And actually, not too many thoughts later, they hit on what I was probing for.

"Relationship," said Ian. (At that point I knew that he has been listening to me before this morning.) :-) "That's right! In each of these stories, the relationship was the most important!"

You and I have read that story, perhaps mainly that verse, many times over. Anger is the same as murder. Don't call your brother a "fool"... or else! Don't bring any offerings before you fix your argument with your brother. But in the bigger picture–the context–I saw that a common theme ran through all of the stories.

But before I get to that, did you notice who bears the relational "responsibility" in the second story? In the first story, Jesus says, "Don't get mad at people." While being so hard to obey it's almost absurd, it's certainly understandable. We all know it's wrong, or at least no the best to treat someone badly in our anger. But who is the relational instigator in the second story? The one who is angry? No! The one with whom someone is angry!

This was a key piece for me. The first one makes sense because we're good at trying to clean up our own act. That makes sense. It at least seems doable, whether it actually is, or not. But the second set of circumstances requires that the one who has not necessarily done any wrong be the one to correct the situation.

So if you are about to place your gift on the altar and remember that someone is angry with you, leave your gift there in front of the altar. Make peace with that person, then come back and offer your gift to God.

Doesn't that sound like we're putting people before God? And perhaps petty, selfish people as well? (It doesn't say "admit that you were wrong" or anything like that. It just says go and make peace.) The paramount concern is not the "more spiritual" offering to God, but rather peace between brothers.

I told the boys that this is true for me as well. I love it when I see my kids getting along, having fun together. I love it even more when I see them making peace with each other (especially without my intervention). It brings me great joy to see peace, harmony, and genuine loving friendship between my children. And I'm sure (from this story Jesus told, and others) that the same is true of our Father.

When I noticed this relational priority, I sort of stepped back and looked at all three stories together. Sure enough, the thread through all three was that relationships are paramount. The first story says don't cloud relationships with angry words. Get over yourself. The second story, as I've mentioned, focuses on the "responsibility" of the "innocent" person to initiate and maintain a peaceful relationship.

The third story is perhaps a more practical application of how relational we are, and may have been played out a bit later in the day. (No, I was not taken to court...)

In the third scene, we have Jesus saying that if we were to find ourselves in court, the best course of action is to make friends with our accuser. On the surface, that makes no sense! Especially if we are innocent, but even if we are not. They're our accuser!!! These are not people we want to reach out to. But the practical side of this is, yes, we do. Jesus implies that if you do, you may avoid the consequences, they may not press charges.

A little relationality goes a long way...

Today I received an order from Amazon.com. They have Big Train Chai at the cheapest price around. When I run out, I usually order two packs of three bags of chai. (They only ship them in sets of three.) I get two because that qualifies it for free shipping as well. :-)

When I very excitedly brought in my package from the super cold porch, I noticed that some powdered chai was pouring out the corners of the box! "Oh no!" I thought perhaps a bag had inadvertently been cut open somehow. I was hopeful that most of them were still intact.

I gingerly cut into the tape at the top of the box, opening it very slowly, checking for any evidence of the cut bag. I brushed off the powder from all of the bags (it had gotten all over everything, even though it was only at most a couple tablespoons of chai) and finally found the culprit. One bag had a very small opening, right near the crease in the bottom. No big deal, but I figured I'd call Amazon and see if they could replace that bag for me.

I got on the phone with a lady who did not speak much English, but seemed very willing to help. I explained my situation calmly, and just asked, "Is there any way you could ship me out one replacement bag? Do you need me to package up and return the defective one?" After a few quick questions - and my friendly answers - she said, "Wait a few moments, and I will process a replacement for you."

I sat on hold for just a few moments, as she had requested, and sure enough, when she came back on the phone she gave me an order ID for the replacement chai! I was thrilled to be getting a little bit of bonus chai. (I really do love this stuff!)

Not long after hanging up the phone, I decided to check the order number at Amazon and see when it would be coming and exactly what they were shipping. What to my wondering eyes should appear, but THREE BAGS OF CHAI in my "recently placed orders"! Whoo-hooo!

Now, I don't know that this lady did anything out of the ordinary. It could be standard policy to just ship the full "package" that was defective. (They do ship as individual bags, so certainly they could have shipped just one.) And I do not know for sure her motivations. But I'd like to think this is a living example of what I saw Jesus saying today.

Relationship is paramount. I was not being taken to court, but I was approaching a situation that did not merit an overly generous response. You can say it is good business to make sure the customer is satisfied, but if I had laid into the first person who answered, demanding a replacement (and/or more?) do you think that the customer service rep's first thought would be to (happily) replace my item? Probably not. Probably there would be some resistance. I have tried the other way - justifiable anger - and I am here to say... it just don't work.

We are made for relationality. If we live it, if we practice it, life goes better.

1 Thessalonians 5:13b (NIV)
Live in peace with each other.

There may be things that seem more important. (Including looking out for ourselves, or doing stuff for God.) But it would seem from these three stories Jesus told to his disciples that the thing that should top the list is to live in healthy, unbroken relationship with each other. And, be the initiator of that. Not just the recipient.

Relationality starts with me.

Freedom

A couple times this weekend, the concept of freedom came up in conversation. It was in relation to the church, and life together as followers of Jesus. And really, it starts with life as an individual follower of Jesus.

When speaking with some friends who are equally saddened by the focus of the American church on numbers and programs and an institutional view of discipleship - and yet, who strangely feel the need to still be part of that social structure - we talked about freedom. One friend brought up the scripture where Jesus says he came to "set us free". He said that it really helped him break out of the "need" - the obligation - to be at a worship service on Sunday mornings. He realized that he was not free. And God helped him realize that through that Scripture.

I think that's true for a lot of people. And much beyond their attendance at weekly (or more frequent) worship gatherings. It does not mean that you are not free if you "go to church" on Sundays. It could, but it doesn't inherently mean that. Where we lack freedom is in really understanding that God does not want us to live life out of obligations to him, but in relationship to him.

I was reading a little book to my boys that paraphrases scripture verses, and one we read last week was taken from the verse in Micah that says, "...and this is what he requires: to do what is right, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God." The last part caught my attention this time. What God "requires" is that we walk (humbly) with him. He wants us to just follow him. To be with him. Every day.

God doesn't want us to always do what's right just because it's right. He wants us to learn to be like him. To live in the freedom of not having to perform for him, to earn his love, or his favor - or to avoid the fires of Hell. What he wants is for us to love as we have been loved. (Love God, and love your neighbor.)

All of the above "requirements" were also written/said during a time when Jesus had not completed the restoration of our relationship with Father God! That's so great! While people were toiling under this idea that sacrifices and following rules would somehow "gain favor" with God, God was telling them, no... just be fair, just, merciful, and follow humbly in his steps. Pretty cool.

Yet today, even though Jesus has once and for all abolished the code of law that restricted and even enslaved us, we still live as slaves to sin and the law. We do not experience the freedom of his grace, and his full and complete love. We don't live as children but as slaves (as that linked passage above refers to). That permeates every bit of how we relate to our Father, and I'm learning more and more that it's not how he wants it to be.

He wants us to walk with him. He calls us friends. He has adopted us as his children, full heirs of everything he has. And he is not a Father who demands strict obedience at the end of a punishing hand, but the Father of the prodigal son who allows us to choose to follow him, to humbly receive his love and live in his freedom.

I'm not sure how we can really break out of the cycle of feeling the need to please him, or even the obligation to "get it right", but oh how I long for that in me, and in you. Shame is a powerful thing over us, and causes us to submit to God out of obligation and out of a perceived relational "debt". But there is no condemnation for those who are in Jesus. The Bible tells me so.

It also tells me this:

If the son has set you free, you are free indeed.

The Goal of Parenting

Earlier this week I was thinking about being a parent. (A parent, not "apparent"...) I think I was processing some issues we're working on with the kids. Maybe I still had some lingering thoughts in my head from a conversation we had with our friends last Sunday about the ups and downs of parenting. Whatever it was, I came to the conclusion—and told myself in my head—that, "The goal of parenting is to raise responsible adults, right?"

Is it?

I mean, sure... in a way, that is part of our responsibility. We get to train up our kids in the way they should go, as the Bible says. We help them learn how to think about other people around them, how to respect authority, how to be responsible with their time and their stuff. Even simple stuff like how to brush their teeth, use soap in the bathtub, and put their clothes in the dirty clothes basket.

(We're still working on that one...)

But right after I thought what I thought above, I had an almost instant second thought, that seemed directly opposed to my first thought. It might not be, but it seemed like it when I thought it.

"Maybe it's not. Maybe we're just supposed to love them."

The thought encompassed more than those words can. So much so that I literally was overwhelmed with emotion, right then and there. I began to think at that moment that all of the stuff I work so hard to train my children to is only secondary. Yes, maybe even the part about loving other people, and considering them even more than themselves. That is certainly important, as is all the stuff I mentioned above, but for a moment I realized that "the greatest of these is love."

The Bible says that we love because he first loved us. I think that truth carries over to our kids, too. We have the capacity to love God, and love other people once we know and experience the love of our Father. Our kids are much the same. They know and experience our love—they know that they are loved—and so they can do the things we teach them to do, because they are loved. Otherwise, it's not in their hearts. It's just temporary adherence to rules.

See, I have a very, very special role in my kids' lives. There are billions of people in this world. They are going to meet many of them. They are going to interact with many of them. They are going to have close relationships with a few of them. They will perhaps marry one of them. But I am their only dad. Ever. There is no one else who ever can be. That was decided when they were conceived.

Does that mean anything? Sort of. Sort of not. What you choose to do after that moment certainly has more impact on them. But this was my point. They will learn lots of things about life from lots of people. I'm glad I am able to get them started on that in a lot of ways. Happy to pass on what I have learned in my short three plus decades. But maybe the best thing I can pass on to my kids is the thing I am uniquely qualified to give them: my love.

Yes, I hope there are many people who love my kids. Completely, and unconditionally. But I am the only one who can offer them my love. I am Dad. They can either feel safe with Dad, and loved by Dad, and secure in who they are with Dad... or not. I think a lot of that is up to me, and maybe what I see as my priorities as a dad. I just said the other day that the one thing I want my kids to learn from me is to think about other people. That's it. I just want them to be different than most people, by just noticing and thinking about others around them.

But I think my job is simpler. Yet, maybe harder.

Perhaps the best things I can give my kids just start with me loving them. Yes, discipline is loving. I understand that. But it becomes meaningless, and so many parents lose the hearts of their kids (in part) because their priority is the life training, rather than the full acceptance and complete and unconditional loving of our kids. I don't know that this is true, but I thought all of this in response to my own statement, "The goal of parenting is to raise responsible adults, right?"

Anyone can and will train our kids in the fundamentals of being a responsible adult. But no one else can be their Mom, or their Dad. I want my kids to know without a doubt that they can count on me—and my love—for anything, any time they need it. Resource-wise, I might not be able to, but me-wise... I can do that.

I am an emotional mess anytime there is a parent-child moment like that in a movie, or tv show, or book, or even between people I know. When I see, for example, a son realize how his dad would do absolutely anything for him to demonstrate his unconditional love, I feel the emotions welling up inside me. When the Dad gets a chance to show even just a little bit of how much he loves his kids... gets me every time. That's what I want. I understand the emotions of those moments, because in real life, the best thing for me isn't when I see my kids showing that they love me (although those are nice), it's even way cooler when I see that my kids know they are loved, and they can actively trust my love.

I'm certain there is a balance in all of this, but that's what priorities are, eh?

Maybe my #2 priority is to raise responsible adults, but my #1 priority—and that's by a lot—is that my kids know without a doubt that Dad loves them, and always, always will. Period.

Jesus Is Staying at MY House!

The boys and I are reading through the book of John now, and this morning we read the story of when Andrew met Jesus, and introduced his brother (Simon Peter) to the Messiah! He was very eager to let his brother know that he had found the Messiah. Not sure if he could have understood how Jesus thought of such a term, but he was certainly excited about it!

The part I thought was a bit different today was the strange question asked of Jesus. The new followers asked Jesus, "Teacher, where do you live?" So, he showed them. They came over to his house.

Ian thought that was as odd as I did, and reasoned that perhaps Jesus was staying with some friends. (Jesus said somewhere else that he had no "place to rest his head", and we know that he's on the road at this point, too.

The interesting thing was not that he was staying with friends, the interesting thing to me is how there's no star power to Jesus. We have no account of him staying with the most important people of the day. We don't know much about it. But to me, that's what stands out.

When we talked about that, I thought in my head, "How cool would it be if Jesus stayed in our house??" But then I realized I was succumbing to "star power".

Jesus is not concerned with popularity. He never sought the limelight, nor did he have "too little time" for people not on his agenda for the day. That's so backwards from what we do today. Often elevating people to levels they should not have to maintain on their own.

It seems like having Jesus stay with you was an instant free ticket to heaven. Seems like someone housing him would have mentioned Jesus' temporary place of residence. But, they don't. And Jesus continues to be a transient.

It's amazing how differently we all can see Jesus, and who he was, what he was doing here. That's something I hope to get from reading through John again. I want to see Jesus for who he is, and learn more about him that I don't already know. I want to see stuff that I have never seen before.

And I am confident that I will. I'll try and share some of those nuggets with you here.

In The Light

A couple things recently have reminded me of the letter in the Bible called first John. I was reminded of a verse I have written about here before. John tells us in that letter that we are taught by the Holy Spirit directly. We don't need others to teach us. (NOTE: I wouldn't say that he means they can't, as I think he was mainly countering some people who were apparently saying something that made him write that. They must have been claiming that the people John was writing to needed to be taught about God through their teaching, and that they couldn't know him on their own. Hmmm... sounds familiar...) Essentially though, he still does say that God is directly involved in teaching us. (Which some today would deny.)

The other thing that reminded me of the book of First John was thinking about "living in the light", and what I used to call "holiness". Holiness to me used to be defined mostly as doing (mostly) the right things. Of course I don't always, and so I am not holy - only God is, eh? - but at times I could feel pretty good about myself because I was mostly "getting it right". I was sorta-kinda "holy". Living in the light.

But not too long ago I picked up the Bible we keep in the bathroom, and started reading First John, since it was on my mind. What I read was actually shocking to me. (So much so that I plan to read it again, and do a commentary here much like I began - and still hope to finish... :-) - on the book of Galatians.) I have always thought of 1st John as a rule-keepers book. "If you do [insert good deed here], then you are a child of God. If you do [insert bad deed here], then you are of the world, [and thus worthy only of hell]. But this time was different.

This time, I saw it not as a causal thing, but more as a statement of reality. And not just the black and white, right and wrong reality... something a bit different than I have ever seen. It seems that John is talking about those who understand the Kingdom and the things of God as those who are "in the Light" (he says early on that "God is Light", and so, "in the Light" could be easily interpreted as "in God"). I have always assumed that phrase to mean, "in the right." I mean mostly outwardly. Doing all the right things. But I think it might be something more. Something different.

When I read it this time, the contrast between light and darkness seemed more one of being able to see. In the dark, you can't see. You don't know what's going on. You bump into stuff, and get hurt. If you turn on a light, you can see. Everything becomes much clearer in the light. You are more free to move around and stuff. In the dark, you mostly stumble around and feel your way around very slowly.

Could this be the picture John is trying to paint for us? Does being in the light just mean being in God, and seeing the world the way he does?

Maybe.

Anyway, the freedom I saw in reading through the whole book was incredible. It's not about getting it right in order to be loved be God... we just are. If we live in the light - in him - we'll see that, and know that more. We'll just see, and be more free to move. I love that imagery.

Once I get through this barrage of new business, I really do want to do a line for line commentary on the book. So, stay tuned, and if you read along, I'd love your comments as well.

They Killed God

Kirstie joined us for the morning Bible read today. She's three, and says some really cute things. Perhaps the following is both cute, and insightful? :-)

After reading the story of the first part of the night Jesus was arrested and taken before the Jewish leaders, then Pilate, and then Herod, we were talking about how crazy it was that they just blatantly lied about such well-known things. Jesus was a very public figure, but his accusers were at best twisting the truth, or just flat out lying about what he said and did. And it eventually got him killed.

And I guess Kirstie knows that, because without reading that today, she said, "They killed God."

I smiled at her simplicity and replied, "Yep. Well, he let them kill him." I continued, "Because somehow, when they did, he was able to beat the things that kills us, that destroy us." (I meant sin and death, but didn't figure a three year old would grasp such a thing.)

She responded without hesitation, "Yeah, then they don't destroy us!" She even said it with a finality and even joy at the resolution of it. Then they don't destroy us. What some people take 1000 pages to say in some theological treatise, my three year old understood, and summed up in two simple phrases.

They killed God. Then they don't destroy us.

Perfect. :-)

Enough of That

So, today we read a little further in Luke (which is just a little later the same night that Jesus said "Enough sword talk!") and would you believe that Jesus said it again? One of the disciples pulls out a sword when the mob comes to arrest Jesus (which, makes sense from what Jesus had just told them a little bit ago...) and he cuts off the ear of one of the dudes. That prompts and "Enough of that!" from Jesus, and it prompted this little dittie that I sang for the boys after we noticed a theme in what Jesus was saying...

Enjoy :-)

Enough of That
Jesus said, "Get your sword"
Sell some stuff, if you must
The disciples said, "We've got two!"
But he said "Enough of that,
Yeah, Enought of that!"

What did he mean?
Oh what did he mean?
Enough of that

Late that night they came to get him
His disciples, well, they were listening
Drew their swords, chopped off an ear
He said enough of that
Yeah enough of that

What did he mean?
Oh what did he mean?
Enough of that
Enough of that

What do we learn from this little story?
Jesus does not like swords
Maybe he shouldn't have used that example
He should have said buy a dog
Or a donkey

Enough of that
Enough of that
What did he mean?
Oh what did he mean?
Enough of that
Enough of that

---

Words & Music by Greg Campbell (and Jesus)
Copyright © 2007

Didn't He Just Say ... ?

Jesus asked his disciples, "When I sent you out without a moneybag or a traveling bag or sandals, did you need anything?"

"No!" they answered.

Jesus told them, "But now, if you have a moneybag, take it with you. Also take a traveling bag, and if you don't have a sword, sell some of your clothes and buy one. Do this because the Scriptures say, 'He was considered a criminal.' This was written about me, and it will soon come true." The disciples said, "Lord, here are two swords!"

"Enough of that!" Jesus replied.

Luke 22:35-38

Didn't he just say they should get a sword, even if they have to sell stuff to get one? And then, when they say, "Look! We have two!" he basically tells them they're totally off track?

This one definitely perplexed me and the boys today. :-)

Bread & Wine

Today we were reading Luke 22 where Jesus is having the Passover meal with his closest friends, just before he will be killed. He knows it, and he's told them... but I'm pretty sure they still don't get it.

It's cool enough how they got into this room (Jesus sent two guys ahead, told them exactly what they would find without having been there, and they did) but there are also a couple cool lines that stood out to me today.

When the time came for Jesus and the apostles to eat, he said to them, "I have very much wanted to eat this Passover meal with you before I suffer."

I thought it was so cool to read the excitement in Jesus' words. Even though he knew what was coming, he was still excited about what the suffering would bring. The end result. Very cool. Ephesians says it was his plan from before he created anything, and that it "gave him great pleasure". Very cool.

As the evening went along, we read the following accounts of the events that took place:

Jesus took a cup of wine in his hands and gave thanks to God. Then he told the apostles, "Take this wine and share it with each other. I tell you that I will not drink any more wine until God's kingdom comes."

Jesus took some bread in his hands and gave thanks for it. He broke the bread and handed it to his apostles. Then he said, "This is my body, which is given for you. Eat this as a way of remembering me!

After the meal he took another cup of wine in his hands. Then he said, "This is my blood. It is poured out for you, and with it God makes his new agreement.

First of all, don't you think they thought it was weird that he said "remembering me"? We know now what happened next, but they didn't. It is obvious from everything they do. So he's already talking about being gone, and they're probably very confused.

Did you also notice there were two cups of wine? Jesus took one cup and told them to share it. Then he shared the bread with them. Then he took another cup of wine after they had finished eating and said this is my blood. The new agreement God makes with you. Again, they were probably a bit weirded out, but I just thought it was interesting that it wasn't that much like what we observe today, supposedly "instituted" by Jesus himself on that very night.

I don't pretend to have a clue what "the Lord's Supper" really is, or any significance of it at all. I really have no idea what Jesus intended for it, if anything. He didn't seem to be a big ritual guy. And really, when I read this... he wasn't here either. They were observing the Passover feast - something Isreal had done for a VERY long time - and those were parts of that. He didn't say, "And make sure you do this exact same thing from now until forever!" I actually don't hear him saying to ever repeat it again. Just... for that moment. Interesting.

NOTE: I don't really want a big theological debate. Just some observations from reading the Bible today. Your comments are welcome, but please know that I won't be engaged in any endless hermeneutical discussions of Scripture and the historical and cultural significance. I'll certainly read/entertain shorter versions... but doctrinal discussions are definitely not my cup of tea... :-)

Jesus Said

... we should be like children.
I think about that phrase quite often, since there are many children around me at any given moment. What part of being a child does Jesus want for us? Does he want us to be disrespectful, selfish, whiny, impatient, messy, crazies with little to no self-control? Uh... I guess... maybe? Probably not. But the innocent, trusting, fun-loving, joyful qualities of a child are easy to understand as qualities of the Kingdom. These are things that, though they might seem a bit unorthodox for the Kingdom ruled by the Creator himself, would seem appropriate.

The other day, my three-year-old daughter was shouting from the top of the stairs, "I neeeed hellllllp... Will somebody pleeeeeeease helllllllp meeee????" She had obediently gone up to the bathroom, done what she needed to do, and now she needed some assistance from an adult - again, obeying her Mom who had previously told her to wait for Mom's assistance after she goes "number two". My first thought was, "Man! That is so annoying!" But quickly, I was reminded of Jesus saying that we needed to be like little children. Could this be one of the ways?

I still maintain that Jesus was NOT talking about whining when he said that.

What I saw was a little girl who needed help, and wasn't afraid to ask for it. Most adults I know are not good at asking for help, maybe they are just plain awful at it. We're taught to be "adults" and take care of stuff on our own. But maybe a way we can be like a child - a way we can see the Kingdom of God - is to realize we need help, and to ask for it. Not necessarily from other people, but definitely from God. Our Father can, and wants to help us. One way we can know the greatness of the Kingdom is to let him help us, allow him to work in us, instead of trying to be an "adult" and get it done ourselves.

A cool lesson from my whiny three-year-old... who may know a bit more about the Kingdom that I have forgotten over my passage into adulthood.

... you will be persecuted because of me ...
Tonight we watched a debate on the existence of God. A friend had sent me the link earlier in the day, and tonight I was intrigued enough to watch it through with Jen. The debate was mostly silly... neither side was really listening to the other. They were to a degree, but neither was going to convince the other of their points, or sway their beliefs in any way. Some of it was sarcastic and mean-spirited... a little annoying actually. :-) I don't think I'm a big fan of debates.

But the thing that I noticed was actually part of the lead-up to the debate. The footage they chose to show to introduce the Christian guys (Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron of The Way of the Master) was of them sharing "the gospel" in the streets, and the hostile reactions of some unbelievers. While that may be common footage, and perhaps an expected response (at least by Christians) ... I was immediately reminded of where Jesus said that his followers would be persecuted because of him.

"Exactly!" misters Comfort and Cameron might say. However, as I recall from Scripture, the people who hated Jesus - who wanted to hurt and/or kill him - were the religious leaders of the day. The leaders of the religious establishment. They were the upstanding, moral, "religious right". We think the people who will persecute Christians, who will hate us because of our message, are the hardened sinners who reject God with passionate fervor. But every example I can think of in the Bible of "sinners" is almost completely the opposite. Those "hardened sinners" flocked to Jesus. It was the self-righteous, cleaned-up, religious folk who persecuted Jesus and his followers.

Just a couple things to think about from what Jesus said.

Quick Kirstie Story

This morning, 3-year-old Kirsten joined Dad and the boys for our morning Bible reading. We are near the end of the book of Luke, and Jesus is getting people riled up - almost the time that they killed him. Which also happened to be Passover, when they kill lambs.

I read the words, "The day had come for the Festival of Thin Bread, and it was time to kill the Passover lambs." Immediately, Kirstie responded, "Oh no!" A seriously concerned look came over her face. Why were they going to kill lambs???

I smiled and tried to explain old testament sacrifices, and even how Jesus was the Lamb of God... and the cool significance there. But I think it might have all been lost on the disturbing thoughts of those bad guys actually killing the Passover lambs!!!

:-)

Mormons, Catholics, Santeras... Oh my!

So, the other night I was going through our video podcasts, getting caught up on the ones I hadn't yet seen. There's a little blue dot next to the new ones, it's really cool. (We use FrontRow on our Mac Mini, hooked up to our TV in our living room.) We watch probably 8-10 different ones, including a couple tech-related ones, a NASA podcast, and a couple more from National Geographic.

Well, one of the National Geographic ones was called "Santeria". I wasn't quite sure what to expect, so I clicked and watched. It was about people in Cuba, celebrating the Feast Day of St. Lazarus. (Or something like that.) It is a Catholic tradition, and in Cuba they go all out. They crawl on their hands and knees (or even bellies) for miles, with pain being a tribute to this "saint".

The interesting part - and the reason for the little podcast - was a lady who is both Catholic, and a Santera. Santeria is a religion which worships many gods, who they believe correlate exactly with the saints of the Catholic church. So, St. Lazarus day also belongs to Babalu Aye, his "twin" African spirit.

I really don't intend to put anyone down here, or start an argument at all... I'm really not sure why or how religious feelings go down so deeply, causing things like what Al Qaeda wants to do to "the infidels", and all the similar events throughout history... but, when I saw this, it just reminded me that all religion is very strange. Even Catholics.

Now, you can say that the strange ones are the Santeras, who "made up" the African spirits that match the Catholic saints. And I know, the saints were at one time just ordinary, historical people. But... at least some Catholics pray to saints, and have these very ritualistic practices on the saints' special days. It's really just as religious as the Santeria religion. (Minus the animal sacrifices...) :-)

Why do most Christians think Mormons are worshipping demons, and have strange religious ceremonies (temple proceedings, baptisms for the dead, etc) when Catholics pray to Mary, various other "saints", and have very religious rituals that are commonly practiced? There are tons of Catholic dotrines that are way outside of what you read in the Bible, and now the Pope (who himself is "outside of what you read in the Bible") is saying that Catholics are the only real Christians.

I'm not bashing Catholics. Or Mormons. Or Santeras. (Ok, they're the strangest of the bunch to me, but...) My point is, religion is so crazy. What is it in us that feels the need to appease a higher power so that life will go well for us. And don't think I'm giving "mainstream" Christianity a pass, either. There are plenty of "appeasement" rituals there, too.

The whole idea that by doing some ritual, or saying some set of words a certain number of times, or anything like that is so foreign to what Jesus taught and lived. Actually, he ridiculed the religious leaders who tried to make others follow meaningless rituals and religious rites. He just loved people, and wanted them to know that God loves them. Sin hurts us, and Jesus came to defeat sin and death for us, cause we can't. And he did.

Religion is a feeble attempt at the reality of life with God that Jesus showed us is possible. And is made possible through him. Not some incantations or rituals we do once a year, or more. But life lived everyday in companionship with our Father who loves us, and Jesus our brother, and his Spirit who lives in us and teaches us everything we need to know.

You can keep trying to make God like you, with your religious rituals - no matter how big or small. Or, you can just accept that he does. And that's that.

[Related reading: He Loves Me by Wayne Jacobsen]

What Belongs To God

Our Bible reading in the mornings has been somewhat sporadic this summer, but hey, we're still making it through the book of Luke just fine. A nice slow and easy pace. :-)

Today we got to a familiar story. Jesus was out in public and some "spies" were sent to trip him up in his own words. They asked him, basically, is it right to pay taxes? They knew that was a totally loaded question, and Jesus handled it brilliantly (the story even ends with the guys who were trying to trick him being quite impressed by his answer).

Jesus said, "Who's picture is on the coin?" They said, "Caesar." He said, "Then give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and give God what belongs to him." For some reason today, those words seemed different. Somehow I saw a connection between the image on the coin, and how that showed it belonged to him, and how we bear the image of God, and Jesus said, "Give to God what belongs to God." If you apply your SAT logic there, then it would fit that WE are what/who belongs to God.

So the boys and I talked a bit about that. Cute moment was when Alex got the answer right. :-) He was soooo thrilled with himself. It was very cute. (It is usually bigger brother Ian who gets all the right answers...) :-) Alex said, "We're made in God's image!" I said, yeah! Like that coin has Caesar's image on it, so he can have it... WE have GOD'S image on us... so, he can have us. Every bit of us.

He doesn't want our money. He wants us.

Good thing, since we don't have much of the former. ;-)

Just a fun way of seeing that story today. We are the image on God's "coin". I've always wanted to have my picture on money...... :-)

By George, You May Be Right!

Tonight as I listened to a podcast about black holes and the research some folks are doing surrounding the somewhat theoretical existence of such things, I thought, "What if we get to heaven and the guys who work so hard to figure out how stuff got started actually turn out to be more right than wrong? That'd surprise AIG a bit..."

I am certain that once things are no longer seen "through a glass dimly", many will be shocked at how things really are. Including me. And I really think it would be neat to find out that God in fact did somehow create these super enormous galaxies with black holes inside of them to somehow balance all that needed balancing in them.

And, regarding the billions of years... what if somehow God did take that long... but somehow also did it in a day? The Bible does reference God being unhindered by time (1000 years is like a day is like 1000 years). It's entirely possible that it is both things simultaneously. I still contend that we just can't know.

But I do love to see all the stuff we do figure out, or at least... sort of figure out. If you'd care to read the article, click the photo above. Pretty cool stuff. (The piranha thing is a bit strange, though...)

When Jesus Is Powerless?

I was reminded of a time from the book of Mark where the Bible says Jesus was not able to perform miracles, and could only heal "a few people".

When I first heard that again, it struck me as quite odd. Here is the Creator of all that is, and he is actually limited by a group of people's lack of faith? Couldn't he work around that somehow? It says he was only able to heal a few people. How strange.

In other instances, Jesus does say, "Your faith has made you well." But, I guess I always just glanced over that a bit. I mean, really. It's not our faith, but God's power, right? Isn't it? Well, if it is... how was it that Jesus was unable to perform miracles in his hometown? How is it that he was so limited?

I think this is a neat reminder that though Jesus certainly was the Word through whom the universe was created, he was also fully, 100% man. He did nothing without the Father's lead. That concept just doesn't make sense. You can't be 100% of two things. That would be 200%, and that's not possible by definition. But Jesus is, and was, and that's just a tad confusing. :-)

Just a little something to get you thinking...

Rules vs. Relationship

At the home of some good friends the other night, my son Ian told our hosts that Alex didn't like something (I forget what) because he doesn't like rules... "just like Dad." :-) That gave our friends a little chuckle (maybe partly because they know it's true!) and initiated a brief conversation about the need for rules in society. One opinion was that, in our fallen state, we need rules. We can't function without them. Another opinion (mine) was that we are not made to be bound by rules. Ideally we live free - governed by our own internal rules. I do admit that not everyone chooses to live this way, which necessitates the "rules", but that's why I think rules are always hurtful. They never help, they always limit and detract from the fullness of whatever they are trying to protect.

But I could still completely see the other point of view. So I pondered a bit more why I think it's possible to live sans rules. What I came up with was just from thinking about my own motivations. When I do something for someone else (or, perhaps, don't do something) it's never to meet the requirements of some rule. I never think, "I need to leave that MacBook Pro on my Dad's desk because the Bible says 'Don't Steal'." Instead, I leave the MBPro there (against my impulses...) :-) because I love my Dad. It belongs to him, and it would hurt our relationship for me to take it.

Now, perhaps you think using my Dad was a bad example. Or something as valuable as a MacBook Pro. Let's take a different example. I'm at the bank, and I use their pen to sign my check and fill out the deposit slip. "The pen seems kinda cool... I need one... they won't miss it..." but then your conscience gets the better of you and you think, "No... God says, 'Don't Steal', and that means pens too!" And you leave the pen, thanks to your obedience to the rule.

But what if relationship - even to someone you don't really know - motivated you instead? Instead of thinking "Thou shalt not steal," maybe think, "That pen belongs to someone else, and I wouldn't like it if they took mine, so I'm not going to take it." Or, if stealing is not your gig... think about anything else we have rules for. Step out of the context of obedience to the RULE and think about how you can love - or not be loving - your neighbor by your actions.

It creates a freedom far beyond what any "righteous" obedience to a set of morals could offer. We are free to love because we are loved. When we love, and act out of love, we are living "under the rules" but not by the rules. Does that make sense? Everything I do, I want to have the people around me in the front of my mind. How will what I do - or don't do - affect those around me? I am not considering rules... I am considering relationship.

There is the freedom of living not under rules, but out of love. The former is accomplished by the latter, but the motivation is different. If motivated by rules, we will always fail. We will not live up to the standards, or maybe even need to "break a rule" in order to love someone. But if we live out of love, the heart of the rule is fulfilled.

Matthew 22:35-40 (New Living Translation)
One of them, an expert in religious law, tried to trap him with this question: “Teacher, which is the most important commandment in the law of Moses?”

Jesus replied, “‘You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. A second is equally important: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ The entire law and all the demands of the prophets are based on these two commandments.”

God & Money

Here's what we read this morning... can anyone make sense of this for me? Jesus seems to be saying, use money like the world does, so you'll have a reward in eternity... but, you can't serve God & money... still trying to figure out what he meant here...

Luke 16:1-13
Jesus said to his disciples:

A rich man once had a manager to take care of his business. But he was told that his manager was wasting money. So the rich man called him in and said, "What is this I hear about you? Tell me what you have done! You are no longer going to work for me."

The manager said to himself, "What shall I do now that my master is going to fire me? I can't dig ditches, and I'm ashamed to beg. I know what I'll do, so that people will welcome me into their homes after I've lost my job."

Then one by one he called in the people who were in debt to his master. He asked the first one, "How much do you owe my master?"

"A hundred barrels of olive oil," the man answered.

So the manager said, "Take your bill and sit down and quickly write `fifty'."

The manager asked someone else who was in debt to his master, "How much do you owe?"

"A thousand bushels [a] of wheat," the man replied. The manager said, "Take your bill and write 'eight hundred'."

The master praised his dishonest manager for looking out for himself so well. That's how it is! The people of this world look out for themselves better than the people who belong to the light.

My disciples, I tell you to use wicked wealth to make friends for yourselves. Then when it is gone, you will be welcomed into an eternal home. Anyone who can be trusted in little matters can also be trusted in important matters. But anyone who is dishonest in little matters will be dishonest in important matters. If you cannot be trusted with this wicked wealth, who will trust you with true wealth? And if you cannot be trusted with what belongs to someone else, who will give you something that will be your own? You cannot be the slave of two masters. You will like one more than the other or be more loyal to one than to the other. You cannot serve God and money.

Our Only Rule Book

Inspired by recent readings, hearings and various thinkings floating through GregsHead, I have thought again about our push for being right. For knowing the truth and letting others "have it". I read a column this morning by a local radio talk show guy who was certainly convinced that he had the "right" answer for what the church should be and do. (Now, I know... that's his job... but still, furthers my point that we all love to be right.)

Maybe Christians are the worst at this. From early on, most of us are taught that there is a right, and definitely a wrong. Actually, many wrongs. We recently heard the Bible referred to as "our only Rule Book". Ouch. Is that what it is? What about all the people who interpret it differently than you do? They have rules, too... just different from yours. In most cases (in the view of both parties) the other guy is wrong. And you're right.

This obsession with being right actually removes us from relationship with other people. We focus so much on having and knowing the "truth" that we must first verify that those with whom we associate are "with us", and "doctrinally correct", and if not, we must instruct them accordingly. There is always a bit of an angst as errors in thinking must not be tolerated. At least when it comes to Christianity.

And there's the rub. We have something (Christianity) that we need to protect, not Someone we want to introduce. An institution is defined. It has a Rule Book. It's easy (at least, sort of) to protect and preserve. A Person is not. Someone who is alive and dynamic (yet the same "yesterday, today and forever") is not easy to define, protect or preserve. Many have said, "You can't keep God in a box." Of course, they were probably referring to "the other guy's box"... but, I believe that statement is true.

For some reason I was reminded of a strange rule we have made up today. Perhaps it's due to hearing of marriages and other similar relationships dissolving for one reason or another. I remembered a "proof text" that many use for when it's "OK" to divorce. Remember when Jesus said that divorce was bad... unlesssss... the WIFE has been unfaithful. Don't you know that people (your intrepid author's former self included) use that to say that if there has been infidelity (perhaps especially from the woman???) that divorce is OK. And hold mightily to the words Jesus said previously that divorce is always bad. Which, I believe is correct, since Jesus seemed to say it as truth... but we leave out the "context" part where something that's bad might be better than something that's worse.

On many such occasions, we take the Rule Book and we bash it over each other's heads... saying my way is right. I got it from the Book! You must be wrong! (Even though our "adversary") is many times doing exactly the same thing. They just view it differently.

I am coming to understand that it's not my job to interpret the "Rules" for someone... for anyone else. My job is to be faithful to my understanding of what God wants from me, and then to love other people as I have been loved. Yes, sometimes love is "tough" and requires an uncomfortable confrontation - BETWEEN FRIENDS. It seems a confrontation is only effective (and then only sometimes) if relationship already exists. If not, why should the confronted change their "aberrant" behavior based on the "Rules" of a stranger?

The Bible is not a Rule Book. God doesn't even want us to live by Rules. The Rules were fulfilled by Jesus. It is finished. That doesn't mean it's not good to live as God intended us to... certainly God's law will last forever. BUT, we were never meant to keep the law... never able to do that. I've been reading Romans again, and Paul emphatically states that:

For no one is put right in God's sight by doing what the Law requires; what the Law does is to make us know that we have sinned. But now God's way of putting people right with himself has been revealed. It has nothing to do with law, even though the Law of Moses and the prophets gave their witness to it. God puts people right through their faith in Jesus Christ. God does this to all who believe in Christ, because there is no difference at all: everyone has sinned and is far away from God's saving presence. But by the free gift of God's grace all are put right with him through Christ Jesus, who sets them free. ... In this way God shows that he himself is righteous and that he puts right everyone who believes in Jesus. What, then, can we boast about? Nothing! And what is the reason for this? Is it that we obey the Law? No, but that we believe.

Taken from Rom 3:20-27, Good News Translation.

If you try to keep the Rules, and make others do the same, you'll only be butting your head up against a wall that won't ever be knocked down. We're meant (I think) to live in the fullness of a restored relationship with our Creator, and then to love the other Createds he puts around us. Rules work perhaps in a computer program... where everything is always (supposed to be) the same. But when people are involved, Rules almost never work. We're too unique. Principles, that can adjust to the context of a situation are more applicable, to be sure. But... maybe we could just make our only "rule" the rule to love everyone we meet, as we have been loved.

At least then the Rule Book would be a lot smaller. :-)

Trust In Action

I'm having a difficult time right now. I know something to be true, even able to put it into very clear words in a conversation with some friends. But I'm having trouble knowing what to do next.

I know God will take care of my family. I know that I am not the provider for our family, my job does not provide for our family... God does. I know that. I trust him to, because I have seen him do it many times over.

Right now, that is very difficult.

Money coming in is lower than usual... probably feels much lower than it actually is. And there have been many expenses this month, and coming up next month. Not a good combination.

So, I'm asking God to let me know what he wants. Does he want to prove himself to me... where I really let go and trust him? Or is there a time where we need to "take some action"? The points from each "side" are volleying back and forth in my head. I'm sure I will hear the same responses. It's funny though.. the line reverberating in my head from one "side" is "God helps those who help themselves" (which is not a scripture...) :-) while one the other "side" I can think of several scriptures :-)

"Without faith it is impossible to please God."

"God is able to do immeasureably more than we could ask or imagine"

"We walk by faith, and not by sight"

Hmm... perhaps I am answering my own question? But that's just it. I know the truth. I trust the Truth. But... what do I DO right now? I still have the bills to pay. I still have a family to feed and clothe?

This is heavy on my heart right now for sure.

Distractions

The boys and I are reading through Luke (I believe I have already said that...) and today Jesus was addressing another crowd (SIDENOTE: I posted an entry here before about how it seemed that Jesus was not usually speaking to crowds but more to small groups and even individuals. It seems however that in Luke, almost everytime something comes out of Jesus' mouth it's to a CROWD, so... I stand corrected. :-) End sidenote...) We read a story, and some more teaching from Jesus.

The story was about a rich man who had an abundant crop. He decided he would store it all up in bigger barns, so he'd be set for the future. God said, "You dummy... you're going to die tonight... what good does all your stuff do you now?" Then Jesus reminded us that birds don't have to worry about what they will eat, and flowers look great, even though they're here today, burned tomorrow. We're more important to God than both of those, so... don't worry.

And we finished today with Jesus saying don't treasure things that can be taken, or eaten. (Moths destroy...) Make your treasure eternal stuff... sorta, intangible stuff. Things that can't be taken. Because, where your treasure is, that's where your heart is.

(Somewhere else it says that your heart is the "wellspring of life"... I think that means it's important...)

So I asked the boys what this meant. First they shook their heads in bewilderment. But with some more directed questions, we figured out that Jesus was trying to tell us not to worry about stuff. Don't "treasure" stuff that will break, could be taken, or will just eventually be gone.

Alex didn't like that so much.

I said, "What if our house burned down? To the ground. Everything was gone. Then what would happen? Would that be bad?"

Ian quickly said no, but Alex had a very concerned look on his face. Finally he said, "That would be bad!"

I said, "Why would that be bad?"

"Well, it would burn down, but we'd have Sega, Nintendo, and Backyard Football?" (He really, really likes video games...)

"No, they'd all be gone. But we're all fine. Would we be OK?" I asked.

He thought for a moment and stuck to his guns, "No..." his eyes were filled with near horror, "That would be bad!"

You gotta love Alex's honesty. He really means it. To him, that would mean the end of his world. For whatever reason, Ian has learned the lesson that stuff does not matter. It's fun. He can enjoy it just as much as Alex, but Alex has wrapped his heart up in stuff. He can not imagine a world without his stuff.

I told him that this was a great example of what Jesus was talking about. Stuff doesn't matter, and Jesus knew that. It's fun, but it doesn't matter. If we "treasure" stuff that will eventually break, be taken, or just die... then our hearts will be crushed with our treasure. Where our treasure is, there our hearts will be also.

And later this morning I got to thinking. I know I would be OK if all my stuff was gone. I would be a bit panicked about all my clients' files and such. Hard to recover all that stuff. I would be bummed to lose the stuff of nostalgic and emotional value. But in the end I'd be OK.

That said, I sure do have a lot to distract me from important stuff! I love video games too. That takes a good amount of my time if I let it. I sure do love my computers, and the internet. That takes time too. I love to watch Star Treks. I love watching Hockey, and Football. I enjoy a good movie now and again. I even enjoy sitting down with a nice book and a cup o' something.

There sure is a lot to "treasure", eh?

So, I think at some point in the not-too-distant future... I may take a serious break from all my stuff. I want to cut away the distractions and spend some good time with Jesus. Every once in a while I long for that (I guess, when I haven't had it in a while?) and now is one of those times. I think he was reminding me of that again today.

Some stuff in life is expendable. Well, OK... probably most stuff. Some stuff is not. Time with my Father who loves me is fantastic. I mean just hanging out time. We're always together. He's with me in everything I do. But sometimes it's good to just be together, not really doing anything else, eh? I think I'm wanting some of that today.

So, I hope your treasures are in the right place today. I don't mean black/white, right/wrong. I just mean, in a place where your heart won't be crushed if your treasure is. We're going to coax Alex toward that better place. Hope he follows.

God Can Throw You Into Hill

Following our morning Bible reading time the other day, Jen was eating breakfast with the kids - may have been also reading a book to them - when Alex interrupts to inform her that, "God can throw people into Hill." She was probably a bit curious as to where that originated... :-) Earlier that morning, the little story we read had Jesus reminding us that we don't need to fear anybody because "once they kill you, they can't do anything else to you." (That was a loose quote...) "But," he continues, "God is the one you should fear. Not only can he kill you, he can throw you into hell."

As I finished saying that, both the boys looked at me wondering, and finally said outloud, "What's 'hell', Dad?" Let me tell you... that's not an easy thing to explain to an 8 year old and a 5 year old. :-) So, I think I kinda did... and they went on their way. But apparently, that little statement from Jesus made an impact on little Alex... who now knows that God can throw people into "Hill".

There is never a shortage of entertaining moments around here... :-)

I Guess I'm Emergent?

Not too sure about the results here, but saw this on Chris' blog and thought I'd take a crack at it. Last time I was Seventh Day Adventist, which was awesome. :-)

You scored as Emergent/Postmodern. You are Emergent/Postmodern in your theology. You feel alienated from older forms of church, you don't think they connect to modern culture very well. No one knows the whole truth about God, and we have much to learn from each other, and so learning takes place in dialogue. Evangelism should take place in relationships rather than through crusades and altar-calls. People are interested in spirituality and want to ask questions, so the church should help them to do this. Emergent/Postmodern 71% Neo orthodox 68% Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan 57% Charismatic/Pentecostal 50% Fundamentalist 39% Classical Liberal 36% Reformed Evangelical 32% Modern Liberal 21% Roman Catholic 14% What's your theological worldview? created with QuizFarm.com

Three In One

This morning the boys were in my office to read the Bible, and we got talking about one particular line we read.

Soon after this, Jesus was going through towns and villages, telling the good news about God's kingdom.

Luke 8:1

So many times we take the good news out of the "good news"! I told the boys that sometimes we make knowing Jesus about knowing what not to do, or what to do, instead of the greatness of a God who loves us. The story we read yesterday was about the woman who came and poured expensive perfume on Jesus, and was crying on his feet, wiping away the tears with her hair. Jesus told the astonished "holy dude" who was with him that someone who is forgiven much will celebrate that forgiveness much more! That's the good news! God's love and forgiveness are available to all!

Somewhere in the conversation we started talking about how the good news is that we get to be close with God, like he's our Dad. And then I said, "And Jesus is like a brother, which is cool." The brothers smiled. "And Jesus, who is God, who is also the Father,